DOL Releases New Model COBRA Notices

COBRA Model Notices

ARRA, as amended by the Continuing Extension Act of 2010 (CEA), mandates that plans notify certain current and former participants and beneficiaries about the COBRA premium reduction.

The Department of Labor has created model notices to help plans and employers comply with these requirements. Each model notice is designed for a particular group of qualified beneficiaries and contains information to help satisfy ARRA’s notice provisions, including those amended by CEA.

Model Updated General Notice

Plans subject to the Federal COBRA provisions must provide the updated General Notice to all qualified beneficiaries (not just covered employees) who experienced a qualifying event at any time from September 1, 2008 through May 31, 2010, regardless of the type of qualifying event, and who have not yet been provided an election notice. This model notice includes updated information on the premium reduction, as well as information required in a COBRA election notice.

Note: Individuals who experienced a qualifying event that was a termination of employment from April 1, 2010 through April 14, 2010 may not have been provided proper notice. Those individuals who have not been provided any notice must get the updated General Notice and receive the full 60 days from the date the updated notice is provided to make a COBRA election. Those individuals who have been provided a notice that did not include information related to the most recent extension must also be provided this updated information. Depending on the specific circumstances, either the Supplemental Information Notice or the Notice of Extended Election Period may be used. See below for additional details.

Model Notice of New Election Period

Plans subject to continuation coverage provisions under Federal or State law should provide, within 60 days of the date of the termination of employment, a Notice of New Election Period to all individuals who:

  • experienced a qualifying event that was a reduction in hours at any time from September 1, 2008 through May 31, 2010;
  • subsequently experience a termination of employment at any point from March 2, 2010 through May 31, 2010; and
  • either did not elect continuation coverage when it was first offered or elected but subsequently discontinued the coverage.

Generally, individuals who have experienced a qualifying event that consists of a reduction of hours and who, from March 2, 2010 through May 31, 2010, experience an involuntary termination of employment must be provided this notice within 60 days of the event. Additionally, CEA provides that for the April 1, 2010 through April 14, 2010 period, the notice requirement attaches to any termination of employment. The Department strongly recommends that notice be provided to individuals who experienced any termination of employment because employers may be subject to civil penalties if it is later determined that the termination was involuntary and notice was not provided.

Model Supplemental Information Notice

Plans that are subject to continuation coverage provisions under Federal or State law should provide the Supplemental Information Notice to all individuals who elected and maintained continuation coverage based on the following qualifying events:

  • all qualifying events related to a termination of employment that occurred from March 1, 2010 through April 14, 2010 for which notice of the availability of the premium reduction available under ARRA was not given; or
  • reductions of hours that occurred during the period from September 1, 2008 through May 31, 2010 which were followed by a termination of the employee’s employment that occurred on or after March 2, 2010 and by May 31, 2010.

For the first item above, plans must provide this notice to all individuals with a qualifying event related to any termination of employment if they have not already been provided notice of their rights under ARRA. This notice must be provided before the end of the required time period for providing a COBRA election notice. For the second item above, generally, individuals who experience an involuntary termination of employment from March 2, 2010 through May 31, 2010 after experiencing a qualifying event that consists of a reduction of hours must be provided this notice within 60 days of the termination of employment. However, as noted above, CEA requires plans to provide notices to all individuals with qualifying events related to any termination of employment that occurred from April 1, 2010 through April 14, 2010. In those cases, this notice must be provided before the end of the required time period for providing a COBRA election notice. Because employers may be subject to civil penalties if it is later determined that the termination was involuntary, the Department strongly recommends that notice be provided to individuals who experienced any termination of employment.

Model Notice of Extended Election Period

Plans that are subject to continuation coverage provisions under Federal or State law must provide, before the end of the required time period for providing a COBRA election notice, the Notice of Extended Election Period to all individuals who:

  •  
    • experienced a qualifying event that was a termination of employment at some time from April 1, 2010 through April 14, 2010;
    • were provided notice that did not inform them of their rights under ARRA, as amended by CEA; and
    • either chose not to elect COBRA continuation coverage at that time or elected COBRA but subsequently discontinued that coverage.

Model Updated Alternative Notice Insurance issuers that offer group health insurance coverage that is subject to comparable continuation coverage requirements imposed by State law must provide the Alternative Notice to all qualified beneficiaries, not just covered employees, who have experienced a qualifying event through May 31, 2010. However, because continuation coverage requirements vary among States, this notice should be further modified to reflect the requirements of the applicable State law. Issuers of group health insurance coverage subject to this notice requirement should feel free to use the model Alternative Notice, the model Notice of New Election Period, the model Supplemental Information Notice, the model Notice of Extended Election Period, or the model General Notice (as appropriate).   

  

 To obtain a copy of these notices, please go to:

 

http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/COBRAmodelnotice.html

2 comments >

IRS Clarifies Rules Regarding Adult Dependents

IRS Clarifies Rules Regarding Adult Dependents

On April 27, 2010, the IRS issued Notice 2010-38, relating to the tax exclusion for medical care reimbursement of adult children. These changes are a result of the two health care reform laws passed in March: the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (HCERA).

The Notice collectively refers to these laws as the Affordable Care Act. Two major changes resulted for adult children of covered employees. First, group health plans must begin to cover adult children up to age 26 for plan years starting after September 23, 2010. Second, the definition of a “dependent” includes adult children up to age 27 for medical care reimbursements under Sec. 105(b) of the Internal Revenue Code. Notice 2010-38 is concerned with the second change.

The IRS clarified that the expansion of the tax exclusion went into effect when HCERA became law on March 30, 2010. This has an immediate effect on plans that define eligibility based on Sec. 105(b), including Health FSAs and health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs).

The Notice makes several important points:

  • The tax exclusion applies for medical care reimbursements of individuals who are not age 27 or older at any time during the calendar year. For example, if an adult child turns 27 in any month of 2010, a Health FSA/HRA cannot reimburse any 2010 expenses for that adult child. However, expenses for adult children who are 26 or younger as of the end of the calendar year may be reimbursed if incurred on or after March 30, 2010.
  • Employers may rely on an employee’s representation as to the birthdate of the adult child.
  • An adult child is defined by reference to Sec. 152(f)(1): son/daughter, stepson/stepdaughter, adopted child or eligible foster child. The other qualifying child requirements in Sec. 152 no longer apply for establishing dependent status. These other requirements include residency and amount of support provided. The amount of the dependent�s income does not matter.
  • This expansion applies to married and unmarried adult children. It does not apply to the spouse or children of those adult children.
  • Current Sec. 1.125-4 rules allow election changes for change in status events. A change in status includes the addition of a dependent under Sec. 152. The IRS indicated that it will change (retroactive to March 30, 2010) this rule to include adult children under age 27. What this means is that participants who add an adult child dependent can increase their current year Health FSA election.
  • The IRS will permit a onetime exception to the rule that all plan changes must be prospective. Employers may amend their cafeteria plans retroactively to allow pre-tax salary reductions for adult children as long as they execute the amendment by December 31, 2010. Infinisource’s plan documents currently refer to Sec. 105(b), so they include the expansive definition of an adult child already.
  • The IRS will amend its Sec. 106 Regulations (relating to accident and health insurance) to match the changes to Sec. 105, even though the Affordable Care Act did not specifically address Sec. 106.
  • This expansion also applies to health care accounts in pension plans (Sec. 401(h)), voluntary employee benefit associations, or VEBAs (Sec. 501(c)(9)), and the self-employed medical tax deduction (Sec. 162).
  • This expansion does not appear to apply to Health Savings Accounts.

The following is a summary of the two provisions relating to adult children:

  Plan Coverage Mandate Tax Deductibility of Medical Care Coverage and Claims
Brief description Plans that cover dependent children must provide for coverage of adult children until they turn age 26. Medical care coverage and claims for adult children are tax deductible until the year in which an adult child turns age 27.
Application to spouse/children of adult child Not applicable. Not applicable.
Additional effect Grandfathered plans can prohibit adult children who are eligible for other group coverage. Election changes are permitted for adding a new dependent.
Effective date Plan years starting after September 23, 2010. March 30, 2010.
Health Care Reform law provision Sec. 1001 of PPACA and Sec. 2301 of HCERA. Sec. 1004 of HCERA.
Applies to existing law Sec. 2714 of the Public Health Service Act. Sec. 105(b) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Several major insurance carriers (e.g., CIGNA, UnitedHealth Group and Humana) have already announced they are adding eligible adult children ahead of September 23, 2010, unless plan sponsors object. Some self-funded employers are doing likewise.

Recall that prior to the Affordable Care Act, tax-free coverage was available for dependent children up to age 19, or age 24 if enrolled as a student. Dependent status was based on satisfying one of two tests as either a qualifying child or a qualifying relative under Sec. 152(c) and (d), respectively. For purposes of providing tax-free medical coverage, the Affordable Care Act has now made it much easier for adult children to qualify.

4 comments >

Your Health Insurer – is it the next regulated utility?

Sent From NAHU News

Judge Rules Against Massachusetts Insurers In Suit Over Rate Hikes.

The New York Times (4/13, A16, Sack) reports, “Gov. Deval L. Patrick won the first round Monday in a legal dispute with health insurers over the state’s recent rejection of rate increases requested by the companies. Ruling in a lawsuit brought by the companies, Judge Stephen E. Neel of Suffolk Superior Court in Boston said he would not block the state from denying the increases because the insurers had not exhausted their right to appeal administratively.”

        According to the AP (4/13), “In his ruling…Neel denied a request from the insurers that the court allow them to go ahead with planned 2010 rate increases for plans covering small businesses. Neel said the insurers hadn’t exhausted the state’s administrative hearing process yet.” Notably, the “state Division of Insurance had rejected the bulk of the proposed increases, saying the companies have not justified them, and that they exceed the medical inflation rate.” But, the “insurers have argued that the state’s decision earlier this month to reject nearly all of their proposed 2010 premium increases will cause ‘destabilizing’ losses for them.”

        The Christian Science Monitor (4/13, Buchanan) says that a total of “six insurance companies sued, arguing the state does not have the regulatory authority to cap premiums. They said they would lose $100 million without the premium increase, plus even more in the administrative costs of having to redesign their plans.”

        Meanwhile, in a front-page article, the Boston Globe (4/13, A1, Weisman) reports, “The case has focused a national spotlight on the tug of war between regulators and a healthcare system over mounting costs for consumers and businesses,” and adds that “Neel’s decision not to grant an injunction sought by the insurers means the state Division of Insurance’s rejection of 235 proposed rate hikes stands for now.” In response to this ruling, Gov. Patrick “hailed Neel’s decision as a victory for small businesses and families that have been burdened by years of rising healthcare expenses.” The Boston Herald (4/13, McConville) and the Boston Business Journal (4/13, Donnelly) also cover the story.

1 comment >

Some small employers may get healthcare tax credit in 2010

As you may know, Health Care Reform has staggered effective dates for different changes. For example, the so-called “Cadillac Plan” excise tax is not effective until 2018. There are items that will be effective much sooner. One of those changes is the small employer health insurance tax credit which is available in 2010. Qualifying small employers are entitled to a tax credit. One of the limitations is that employers have no more than 25 full-time equivalent employees who meet other requirements in the law. However, as with many things in the tax code, even counting to 25 is not straightforward. The new law includes a number of special rules, including exclusions for some employees and rules for assessing how part-time employees are taken into consideration. The IRS has issued informal guidance on the small employer tax credit on its website in several places:

http://apps2.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=220809,00.html

http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=220839,00.html

http://apps2.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=220848,00.html

no comments >

Continuing Extension Act of 2010 (HR 4581) is now law

President Obama last night (April 15) signed the Continuing Extension Act of 2010 (HR 4581).  This bill contains two basic provisions applicable to COBRA and the ARRA (the full text applicable to COBRA is copied below for your review).

1.       The last QE Date eligible now for treatment as an AEI is May 31, 2010.

2.       All QBs whose QE Date was on or after April 1, 2010 who have not received an SR which included the ARRA information should receive an updated SR and a new 60-day election window from the date of the new SR.

no comments >

Plan Sponsors get ready for new electronic 5500 Filing Requirements

2009 IRS Forms 5500 Electronic Filing Requirements and EFAST2 Filing System

Getting Ready for EFAST2 discusses the 2009 plan year requirement to file IRS Form 5500 electronically.

Plan sponsors have three options for entering data on the Form 5500 (and Schedules) and filing it electronically:

  1. a private web-based system (e.g., Relius Web Client)
  2. a third party software application, which then transmits it to the DOL via the Internet; or
  3. the DOL’s web-based system (IFILE).

 

The private web-based system provides the most user-friendly and efficient arrangement for administrators and financial institutions completing numerous 5500s. A large employer completing its own 5500s in-house may use third party software to complete and transmit its 5500s to the DOL. A third party administrator (TPA) or financial institution completing 5500s on behalf of plan sponsors can use third party software to complete the 5500s but would need to upload the 5500s on to IFILE in order to facilitate the electronic signature and transmittal to the DOL. The DOL has designed IFILE for practitioners who complete 2-3 5500s. The DOL has not designed the system to accommodate preparers who complete a large volume of 5500s.

It also contains the following FAQs:

  • When is the mandatory electronic filing system (EFAST2) effective?
  • Must all retirement plans file electronically?
  • How does a plan sponsor obtain electronic signature credentials?
  • May a TPA or financial institution obtain signer credentials on behalf of its clients?
  • How do I use the electronic signature credentials in filing a Form 5500 electronically?
no comments >

COBRA Subsidy Extension Clears Procedural Hurdle In Senate

Legislative Update :

Yet Another COBRA Subsidy Extension Enacted

Late this afternoon, the Senate, by a vote of 60 to 34, invoked cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 4851, the Continuing Extension Act of 2010.  Among othProcedural Hurdleer items, H.R. 4851 provides a one-month extension of the COBRA premium subsidy through April 30, 2010.  The extension would be retroactive until April 1.  The Senate expects to take up the measure on Tuesday with a vote on final passage expected on Thursday.  Four Republicans — Senators Scott Brown (MA), Susan Collins (ME), Olympia Snowe (ME), and George Voinovich (OH) — voted in favor of cloture on the motion to proceed.

no comments >

COBRA Subsidy Extension Senate Vote Expected Today

Apr 12, 2010

Congressional Quarterly: A 65 percent subsidy that helped laid-off Americans pay for their COBRA health insurance premiums expired March 31, just before the Congressional recess. Now, one of the first orders of business is voting on legislation that would extend that subsidy. “With 15 million Americans unemployed, some advocates for the jobless say Congress should not only be extending the COBRA subsidies but expanding them — either with more-generous subsidies or by changing the law to make more people eligible.”

“Meanwhile, California Democrat Barbara Boxer has introduced a Senate bill that would enable domestic partners, same-sex spouses and extended family members of a covered worker to continue their own coverage under COBRA” (Benson, 4/12).

The legislation that is set for a Senate vote Monday would extend subsidies through May 5, according to The Washington Post. “Democrats will need at least one Republican supporter to get the 60 votes necessary to proceed.” But while jobless benefits are traditionally seen as having bipartisan backing, this extension has proved more partisan. “Each party has been eager to blame the other for the cutoff. … Democrats point out that they easily moved an extension through the House and were primed to do the same in the Senate before Republicans, led by Sen. Tom Coburn (Okla.), stood in the way. … Republicans respond that they’re not opposed to extending unemployment benefits but want to offset the $9 billion cost with spending cuts elsewhere” (Pershing, 4/12).

The Atlanta Journal Constitution: “For Republicans, the theme of this fight is pretty simple. If you can’t find $9.2 billion to pay for an extra month of benefits in a budget that’s well over $3 trillion, then you’ve got quite a problem with spending.” Democrats charge that “Republicans continue to treat the American people as expendable political pawns,” according to a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.”

“The fight comes as 33 different states have now run out of unemployment benefits money, and are borrowing cash from the feds to make up the difference” (Dupree, 4/12).

The New York Times: Democrats claim that COBRA and other jobless benefits are traditionally treated as “an emergency, and that the payments help the economy and generate new tax revenues, since the money is typically immediately applied to essential purchases. … Republicans say the difference now is that the nation has sunk far too deep into deficit spending to continue to put the jobless benefits on the national credit card” (Hulse, 4/9).

no comments >

COBRA subsidy expires following inaction by U.S. Senate

Posted by:

Keith L. Martin, IFAwebnews.com

April 1, 2010

While members of the U.S. Senate enjoy a spring recess, hundreds of thousands of Americans are wondering what will become of their health coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA).

Senate members adjourned earlier this week without addressing a comprehensive unemployment benefits package, including COBRA benefits set to run out starting on April 5. The Senate is set to reconvene April 12.

That leaves a gap in the COBRA program, meaning those involuntarily terminated from their jobs as of March 31 will not be eligible for a federal subsidy through the government to continue their health coverage. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as “the stimulus package,” created a 15-month subsidy of 65% for workers involuntarily terminated by their employer between Sept. 1, 2008, and March 31, 2010.

The Senate and House have been engaged in a back and forth battle over unemployment benefit extensions. When the Senate adjourned on March 25, it did so without addressing HR 4851, the Continuing Extension Act of 2010, extending the COBRA subsidy and other programs, including the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

The lone objection of Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) halted passage of the bill as the legislator expressed his objection to the lack of a dedicated plan to pay for the extensions.

Coburn’s objection has drawn the scorn of many, including the National Employment Law Project, which said the senator’s obstruction could force as many as 1 million unemployed workers to go without benefits this month.

“It is unacceptable that Congress has, for a second time, failed to extend the existing federal benefits programs with so many people counting on this assistance,” said Christine Owens, the Washington, D.C.-based group’s executive director, in a statement. “We have been down this road already and seen the turmoil it caused. Congress cannot continue to play games with people’s lives. They need to get the job done, now,”

Following the adjournment, Coburn chided the House members’ decision to focus on being fiscally responsible with their recommendation to extend benefits by adding to the nation’s “debt crisis.

“The American people and the rest of the world understand that our debt and deficits are as much of an emergency as our unemployment rate,” Coburn said in a statement. “The American people also understand the best unemployment benefit is a job. An economy with as much debt as our simply can’t create jobs at the rate we need them. Members of Congress who choose to ignore this reality will, soon enough, be replaced with people who understand this reality and choose to live and govern within it.”

On March 10, the Senate passed its own unemployment insurance benefit measure – HR 4213 (the American Workers, State and Business Relief Act of 2010) – to extend COBRA and other benefits through the end of the year.

The House and Senate, however, have yet to reach an agreement on the two bills, a necessity before it can head to President Barack Obama for his signature.

no comments >

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

 

 

Revised March 30, 2010

After a year of debate, Congress passed comprehensive health care reform legislation. On March 21, 2010, the House of Representatives passed the Senate-version legislation, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590) (the “Affordable Care Act”) and a separate budget reconciliation bill, The Health Care and  Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (H.R. 4872) (the “Reconciliation Act”), which addresses the House Democrat’s desired modifications to the Affordable Care Act. The president signed the Affordable Care Act into law on March 23, 2010 and signed the reconciliation Act into law on March 30, 2010.

Numerous state legislators are already passing laws to exempt their citizens from elements of the health care reform package, specifically the individual and employer mandates. Whether these laws are preempted by federal legislation will be an issue for the courts to address. As the health reform legislation stands today, the issues affecting individuals and employers are outlined below in order of implementation deadline.

90 Days After Enactment

Temporary Retiree Reinsurance Program

Ninety days after enactment, a federal reinsurance program will be available for employers providing insurance for retirees over age 55 years of age, who are not eligible for Medicare. The program will reimburse employers for 80 percent of claims incurred for the retirees between the ages of 55-64 for costs between $15,000 up to $90,000. There was no change in the Reconciliation Act to this provision.

National High-Risk Pool

Ninety days after enactment, a federally subsidized high-risk pool will be established for individuals with preexisting conditions who have been uninsured for at least six months. There are certain restrictions for variance of premiums according to age and a maximum cost sharing of $5,950 for individuals and $11,900 for families.

The legislation appropriates $5 billion for this high-risk pool. This national program can work with existing state high-risk pools and will end on January 1, 2014, once the exchanges are operational and other preexisting condition and guarantee issue provisions take effect.

Six Months After Enactment

Dependent Coverage

For plan years beginning six months after the date of enactment, plans would be required to provide coverage for adult children up to age 26. Until 2014, grandfathered plans are only required to provide such coverage if the dependent does not have access to other employer-sponsored coverage. The Reconciliation Act amends Section 105 of the Internal Revenue Code and states that the cost of health coverage for dependent children through age 26 is excluded from taxable income. Thus, the coverage is nontaxable even if the child is not the employee’s  d

 

ependent” for tax purposes. There is no requirement that the individual be a student to qualify for coverage under this provision.

No Rescissions

For plan years beginning six months after the date of enactment, plans would be prohibited from rescinding coverage except in the case of fraud or intentional misstatement of material fact. Applies to new plans, grandfathered plans and self-funded plans.

No Lifetime/Restrictive Annual Limits

For plan years beginning six months after the date of enactment, new and existing fully-insured and self-funded plans are prohibited from having lifetime limits on coverage or restrictive annual limits. Annual limits will be allowed through 2014 only on Health and Human Services (HHS) defined non-essential benefits.

Pre-Existing Conditions

 

For plan years beginning six months after the date of enactment, there can be no pre-existing limitation for coverage of children under age 19, although insurers could still reject those children outright for coverage in the individual market until 2014. Applies to new and grandfathered plans.

 

Preventive Care Mandate

Preventive care that the US Preventive Services Task Force rates A or B will be covered by group and individual health plans (fully insured and self-funded plans) with no cost sharing for plan years beginning six months after enactment. Minimum preventive coverage also includes immunizations recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization practices for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Also included for infants, children and adolescents are evidence-informed preventive care and screenings provided for in the comprehensive guidelines supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration. Additional services for women are also included.

Highly Compensated Individuals

For plan years beginning on or after six months after enactment, a plan sponsor of a group health plan may not establish rules relating to the health insurance coverage eligibility (including continued eligibility) of any fulltime employee that are based on the total hourly/annual salary of the employee; the plan sponsor also may not establish eligibility rules that have the effect of discriminating in favor of higher wage employees in any manner.

This requirement is similar to the rules already in existence for self funded plans and qualified benefits under a cafeteria plan.

Certain Covered Benefits

For plans years beginning on or after six months after the date of enactment, fully-insured group and individual health plans and self-funded group plans must cover emergency services at in-network levels, regardless of provider, without prior authorization. Also enrollees must be permitted to designate any in-network doctor as their primary care physician (including an OB/GYN or pediatrician).

New Appeals Procedures

For plan years beginning on or after six months after enactment, insurers and self-funded plans must implement new mandated appeals processes with both internal and external appeal rights. HHS is charged with providing the procedural standards. Grandfathered plans appear to be exempt from the requirement.

 

Year 2010

Small Employer Tax Credit

For years 2010 through 2013, businesses with fewer than 25 employees and average wages of less than $50,000 are eligible for a tax credit of up to 35 percent of the employer’s contribution toward the employee’s health insurance premium if the employer contributes at least 50 percent of the total premium cost or 50 percent of a benchmark premium. Tax-exempt businesses meeting the requirements above are eligible for the tax credits but are entitled to a maximum credit of 25 percent of their contribution toward the employee’s health insurance premium.

Reporting on Medical Loss Ratio

Effective in 2010, health insurance plans, regardless of grandfathered status, are required to report the proportion of premium dollars spent on clinical services, quality, and other costs. Nonprofit Blue Cross Blue Shield plans must maintain a MLR of 85 percent or higher to take advantage of special tax status.

Medicare Prescription Drugs

The approximately 4 million Medicare beneficiaries who hit the so-called “donut hole” in the program’s drugplan will get a $250 rebate in 2010. Next year, their cost of drugs in the coverage gap will go down by 50 percent. In 2011, the bill would also begin phasing down the beneficiary coinsurance amount in the coverage gap so that it reaches the standard 25 percent beneficiary coinsurance by 2020.

Rate Review

The HHS must establish a process for reviewing premium rate increases and requires insurers to justify rateincreases. Carriers that have a pattern of unreasonable increases may be barred from participating in the exchanges.

Year 2011

Medical Loss Ratio

Effective in 2011, insurers must provide rebates to consumers for the amount of the premium spent on clinicalservices and quality that is less than 85 percent for plans in the large group market and 80 percent for plans in the individual and small group markets. A process will be established for reviewing increases in health plan premiums and requiring plans to justify increases. States are required to report on trends in premium increases and recommend whether certain plan should be excluded from the Exchange based on unjustified premium increases.

Medicare Advantage Plans

The Reconciliation Act would freeze Medicare Advantage (MA) payments for 2011. MA payments would be restructured by tying them to 100 percent of Medicare fee-for-service costs, providing bonuses for quality and making adjustments for unjustified coding patterns. The government currently pays the private plans an average of 14 percent more than traditional Medicare. Besides reducing payments overall, there will be a shift in funding, with some high-cost areas to be paid 5 percent below traditional Medicare and some low-cost areas to be paid 15 percent more than traditional Medicare.

Employer Reporting

Employers must begin reporting information concerning an employee’s insurance benefits on the employee’sForm W-2. If the employee receives health insurance coverage under multiple plans, the employer must disclose the aggregate value of all such health coverage, but exclude contributions to HSAs and salary reduction contributions to FSAs. Applies to benefits provided during 2011 and reported in 2012.

HSA/FSA/HRA Restrictions

Starting in 2011, there will be no tax-free coverage for over the counter items under HSAs, FSAs, HRAs and Archer MSAs; and, there will be a higher penalty for nonqualified HSA distributions of 20 percent, up from 10 percent.

CLASS Act

The “Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act” or the “CLASS Act” becomes effective in 2011 and establishes a national voluntary long-term care insurance program for purchasing community living assistance services and supports. The Secretary of HHS is required to establish procedures for individuals to automatically enroll in the CLASS program by an employer in the same manner as an employer may automatically enroll employees in a 401(k) plan.The Secretary is also required to establish an “alternative” enrollment process (other than auto-enrollment) for individuals who are self-employed, who have more than one employer, or whose employer does not elect to participate in the automatic enrollment process.

Cafeteria Plan Safe Harbor

Beginning on Jan. 1, 2011, small employers (100 or fewer employees) will be allowed to adopt new “simple cafeteria plans.” In exchange for satisfying minimum participation and contribution requirements, these plans will be treated as meeting the nondiscrimination requirements that would otherwise apply to the cafeteria plans.

Year 2012

Uniform Benefit Summaries

All group plans and group and individual health insurers (including self-funded plans) will have to provide asummary of benefits and coverage explanation that meets specified criteria to all enrollees. The summary and explanation can be provided electronically or in written form and there is a $1,000 per enrollee fine for willfulfailure to provide the information.

Year 2013

Increase Tax for High-Income Taxpayers

Effective 2013, for single taxpayers with adjusted gross income (“AGI”) of $200,000 or more and joint filers withAGI of $250,000 or more, the Reconciliation Act would add a new tax of 3.8 percent on investment income from interest, dividends, annuities, royalties, rents and capital gains (“net gain from disposition of property”).The tax would not include income that is derived in the ordinary course of a trade or business that is not a passive activity. This additional tax would not apply to qualified plan distributions under Code sections 401(a),403(a), 403(b), 408 408A, or 457(b). This 3.8 percent tax is in addition to the 0.9 percentage point increase inthe Medicare payroll tax on earned income.

 

Flexible Spending Arrangements (FSAs)

The Reconciliation Act would delay the effective date of the new annual limit on health flexible spending arrangements until 2013, at which time the FSA contribution would be capped at a maximum of $2,500, indexed thereafter to general inflation.

Taxation of Retiree Drug Subsidies

Currently, the law provides tax subsidies to encourage employers to maintain retiree drug coverage for their Medicare-eligible retirees. The subsidies are excluded from taxation so that employers would be incentivized to continue this benefit for retirees. In 2013, the employer tax deduction for prescription drug claims will be reduced by the Part D Retiree Drug Subsidy amount payable to the employer.

Employer Notice Requirement

All employers are required, as of March 1, 2013, to provide notice to their employees informing them of the existence of the exchange. The federal authorities will supply a standard template for compliance.

Year 2014

Insurance Reforms

In 2014, the Reconciliation Act would prohibit:

  • Pre-existing condition exclusions (for children,  

    the exclusions are prohibited starting six months after enactment)

  • Lifetime limits (already prohibited)
  •  Annual limits on coverage (which were restricted beginning six months after enactment
  • Denial of coverage for dependents to age 26 (regardless of whether they have access to another source of employer sponsored coverage)
  • Also fully insured plans must provide guarantee issue and renewal.
  • Further all individual policies and all fullyinsured small group (100 lives and under) policies (provided inside or outside of exchange) must abide by strict modified community rating standards with premium variations only allowed for age (3:1), tobacco use (1.5:1), family composition and geographic regions.
  • Annual and lifetime limits apply to fully-insured and self-funded plans.
  • Waiting periods exceeding 90 days.Employer Mandate

 

Effective in 2014, employers with more than 50 employees that do not offer coverage and have at least one full-time employee who receives a premium tax credit will be fined an amount equal to $2,000 per full-time employee (reduced from $3,000 per full-time employee in H.R. 3590), excluding the first 30 employees from the assessment (also added by the Reconciliation Act).

Employers with more than 50 employees that do offer coverage but have at least one full-time employee receiving a premium tax credit because coverage is “unaffordable,” will pay the lesser of $3,000 for each employee receiving a premium credit or $2,000 for each full time employee. Coverage would be considered “unaffordable” if the premiums for the class of coverage selected by the employee exceed 9.5 percent of family income (down from 9.8 percent in H.R. 3590). Employers with 50 or fewer employees are exempt from penalties.

 

“Full-time” employee means an individual who averages 30 or more hours at least one week in a month. The Reconciliation Act added full-time equivalents for purposes of determining whether the 50-employee threshold is met. That is, solely for purposes of determining whether an employer is an applicable large employer, an employer must, in addition to the number of full-time employees for ny month otherwise determined, include a number of full-time equivalent employees determined by dividing the aggregate number of house of service of employees who are not full-time employees for the month by 120. Full-time equivalents are not used to determine the assessment of a penalty.

Employer Voucher

Effective in 2014, employers that offer coverage would be required to provide a free choice voucher to employees with incomes less than 400 percent FPL whose share of the premium exceeds 8 percent ut is less than 9.8 percent of their income and who choose to enroll in a plan in the Health Insurance Exchange. The voucher amount is equal to what the employer would have paid to provide coverage  for the employee under the  employer’s plan and will be used to offset the premium costs for the plan in which the employee is enrolled.

Employers providing free choice vouchers will not be subject to penalties for employees that receive premium credits in the Exchange. No change to this provision by the Reconciliation Act.

Auto-Enrollment

Employers with more than 200 employees must automatically enroll employees coverage offered by the employer. Employees may opt out of coverage. No change to this provision by the Reconciliation Act.

Small Business Tax Credit

Small employers with no more than 25 employees and average annual wages of less than $50,000 that purchase health insurance for employees are provided with a tax credit. For 2014 and later, for eligible small businesses that purchase coverage through the Health Insurance Exchange, a tax credit is provided of up to 50 percent of the employer’s contribution toward the employee’s health insurance premium if the employer contributes at least 50 percent of the total premium cost. The credit will be available for two years. The full credit will be available to employers with 10 or fewer employees and average annual wages of less than $25,000. Tax-exempt businesses meeting the requirements above are eligible for the tax credits but are entitled to a maximum credit of 35 percent of their contribution toward the employee’s health insurance premium.

Individual Mandate

Citizens and legal residents are required to have “minimum essential coverage” by year 2014. Those without coverage pay a tax penalty of the greater of $695 per year up to a maximum of three times that amount ($2,085) per family or 2.5 percent of household income. The penalty will be phased-in according to the following schedule: $95 in 2014, $325 in 2015, and $695 in 2016 for the flat fee or 1.0 percent of taxable income in 2014, 2.0 percent of taxable income in 2015, and 2.5 percent of taxable income in 2016. After 2016, the penalty will be increased annually by the cost-of-living adjustment. Exemptions will be granted for those for whom the lowest cost plan option exceeds 8 percent of an individual’s income, and those with incomes below the tax filing threshold (in 2009 the threshold for taxpayers under age 65 was $9,350 for singles and $18,700 for couples).

Additional exceptions include people with financial hardship, religious objectors, American Indians, people with coverage for less than three months, undocumented immigrants, and incarcerated individuals. The Reconciliation Act changes the penalty calculations, which are included in the numbers referenced above.

 

Individual Subsidies

Premium credits are made available to “eligible” individuals and families with incomes between 133 and 400 percent of the federal poverty level to purchase insurance through the Health Insurance Exchanges. Eligibility is limited to American citizens or legal residents who lack affordable employer- sponsored coverage and fit within the income levels outlined above. The premium credits will be tied to the second lowest cost plan in the area and will be set on a sliding scale. For example, people with incomes under 133 percent of FPL will pay only 2 percent of income toward premiums, while people between 300-400 percent of FPL will pay 9.5 percent of income toward premiums. There are also cost-sharing tax credits so that certain low-income people will pay only a small percentage of their income toward their insurance expenses.

Benefit Design

Effective in 2014, an essential health benefits package is established that provides a comprehensive set of services, covers at least 60 percent of the actuarial value of the covered benefits, limits annual cost-sharing to the current law HSA limits ($5,950/individual and $11,900/family in 2010), and is not more extensive than the typical employer plan. Abortion coverage is prohibited from being required as part of the essential health benefits package.

Effective in 2014, all qualified health benefits plans, including those offered through the Health Insurance Exchanges and those offered in the individual and small group markets (except grandfathered plans) are required to offer at least an essential health benefits package.

Expanded Medicaid Eligibility

States will have the option starting in 2014 to expand Medicaid eligibility to non-elderly, non-pregnant individuals who are not otherwise eligible for Medicare, with incomes up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL). From 2014 through 2016, the federal government will pay 100 percent of the cost of covering newly eligible individuals.

 

Health Insurance Exchanges

Effective in 2014, state-based Health Insurance Exchanges and Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) Exchanges must be established, administered by a governmental agency or non-profit organization, through which individuals and small businesses with up to 100 employees can purchase qualified coverage.

States are permitted to allow businesses with more than 100 employees to purchase coverage in the SHOP Exchange beginning in 2017. States may form regional Exchanges or allow more than one Exchange to operate in a state as long as each Exchange serves a distinct geographic area. (Funding available to states to establish Exchanges within one year of enactment and until January 1, 2015).

Wellness Initiatives

Starting for plan years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2014, HIPAA wellness program incentive limit will increase from 20 percent to 30 percent of total cost of coverage; regulations may increase the 30 percent up to 50 percent. The Reconciliation Act did not alter this provision.

 

This material was created by National Financial Partners Corp., (NFP), its subsidiaries, or affiliates for distribution by their Registered Representatives, Investment Advisor Representatives, and/or Agents. This material was created to provide accurate and reliable information on the subjects covered. It is not intended to provide specific legal, tax or other professional advice. The services of an appropriate professional should be sought regarding your individual situation. Neither NFP Securities, Inc. nor NFP Benefits offer legal or tax services.

Securities offered through Registered Representatives of NFP Securities, Inc., a Broker/Dealer and Member FINRA/SIPC. Investment Advisory Services offered through Investment Advisory Representatives of NFP Securities, Inc. a Federally Registered Investment Adviser. NFP Benefits Partners is a division of NFP Insurance Services, Inc., which is a subsidiary of National Financial Partners Corp, the parent company of NFP Securities, Inc. NFP Securities, Inc. is not affiliated with any other entities listed on this document. Not all of the individuals using this material are registered to offer Securities or Investment Advisory services through NFP Securities, Inc.

no comments >