Receive updates through RSS feed or email:
myBenefitsBlog.comJoin RSS Feed | Learn more about RSS

News and Views for the Employee Benefits Community

myBenefitsBlog.com

American Benefits Group Network:

American Benefits Group
myFlexResource myCommuterConnect myCOBRAResource myHSAver


  • Categories

    • Cafeteria Plans (6)
    • CDHC (27)
    • COBRA (17)
    • Compliance and Regulatory (65)
    • DOL (4)
    • ERISA (2)
    • Flexible Spending (20)
    • FSA (11)
    • Health Care Reform (54)
    • Health Reimbursement (20)
    • Health Savings Account (16)
    • Health Savings Accounts (19)
    • HHS (2)
    • HIPAA (2)
    • HRA (15)
    • HSA (19)
    • IIAS (4)
    • IRS (29)
    • Medicare (1)
    • PPACA (17)
    • Section 125 Plans (6)
    • State Legislation (9)
    • Taxes (28)
    • Transit and Parking Section 132 (1)
    • Uncategorized (51)
  • Archives

    • May 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • November 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • December 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Recent Articles

    • 2013 HSA Contribution Limits Released
    • Summary of Benefit Coverage Requirements for Health FSAs and HRAs
    • Court Finds Employer Met ERISA’s Voluntary Plan Safe Harbor, Despite Payment of Premiums Through Cafeteria Plan
    • HHS Issues Health Care Exchange Rules
    • HHS issues draft bulletin defining Actuarial Value for Health Plans

2013 HSA Contribution Limits Released

May 3rd, 2012 | No Comments |
Category: HSA, Health Savings Account, Health Savings Accounts, Uncategorized

IRS has just issued Revenue Procedure 2012-26, which provides the 2013 cost-of-living contribution and coverage adjustments for HSAs, as required under Code Section 223(g). Most contribution limits and the out-of-pocket amounts have been increased for 2013.


2013 Annual Contribution Limit:

Single coverage: $3,250 (up from $3,100 in 2012)
Family coverage: $6,450 (up from $6,250 in 2012)

2013 Minimum Deductible for HDHP:
Single coverage: $1,250 (up from $1,200 in 2012)
Family coverage: $2,500 (up from $2,400 in 2012)

2013 Maximum Out-of-pocket:

Single coverage: $6,250 (up from $6,050 in 2012)
Family coverage: $12,500 (up from $12,100 in 2012)

For a copy of Revenue Procedure 2012-26, please click on the link below:

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-12-26.pdf

no comments >

HSA minimum deductible will rise to $2,500 family and $1,250 individual in 2013

February 25th, 2012 | No Comments |
Category: CDHC, Compliance and Regulatory, HSA, Health Savings Account, Health Savings Accounts, IRS, Taxes, Uncategorized

The HSA minimum deductible, a benchmark for comparing HSAs with traditional PPO plans, will rise to $2,500 family and $1,250 individual in 2013, the first increase in the past 3 years, according to former Treasury official Roy Ramthun who makes the annual estimate using near-final government data.

A statutory technical freeze on the rise for three years has resulted in the average employee plan deductible without an HSA rising to virtually the same amount as an HSA minimum deductible. This  means people who are offered a choice often now see little difference in deductibles if they pick an HSA. Now HSAs will probably rise at closer to the same rate as regular HD plans.

Health reimbursement accounts (HRAs) have no minimums on how much the deductible is or the level of the employer contribution. In real market terms, HRAs typically have lower deductibles and generate less out-of-pocket cost than HSAs. So if anything the faster-rising minimum HSA deductible will make that difference with HRAs even greater from the consumer point-of-view.

Ramthun also announced that the maximum contribution to HSAs in 2013 will  hit a new high of $6,450 family and $3,200 individuals (self-only), plus $1,000 for those over 55 who will be allowed a total of $7,450.  Anybody can contribute up to the maximum regardless of their deductible (combined EE and ER), so a rise in the total allowed makes HSAs more attractive as investments.

© Interpro Publications 2012

no comments >

IRS Issues 2011 Version of Publication 969 on HSAs, HRAs, Health FSAs and MSAs

January 31st, 2012 | No Comments |
Category: CDHC, Cafeteria Plans, Compliance and Regulatory, FSA, Flexible Spending, HRA, HSA, Health Care Reform, Health Reimbursement, Health Savings Account, Health Savings Accounts, IIAS, IRS, Section 125 Plans, Taxes, Uncategorized

Publication 969 has been updated for use in preparing 2011 tax returns. This publication provides basic information about HSAs, HRAs, health FSAs, Archer MSAs and Medicare Advantage MSAs, including brief descriptions of benefits, eligibility requirements, contribution limits and distribution issues. There are very few changes to the 2011 version. The publication has been updated to reflect two changes that apply beginning in 2011: the prescription requirement for OTC drugs (other than insulin) purchased after 2010, and the increase (to 20 percent) in the additional tax on HSA and MSA distributions not used for qualified medical expenses.

Click here to view IRS Publication 969.

no comments >

Health Care Benefits Options for Small Business Owners in the New World

January 24th, 2012 | No Comments |
Category: CDHC, Compliance and Regulatory, HRA, HSA, Health Care Reform, Health Reimbursement, Health Savings Account, Health Savings Accounts, IRS, PPACA, State Legislation, Taxes, Uncategorized

What Small-Business Owners Need to Know about Health Care Benefits

Offering comprehensive benefits to employees can help you attract, hire, and retain the best workers. Yet many small-business owners believe that health care insurance is a luxury they can’t afford. The good news: Thanks to new incentives, tax credits, industry reform, and nontraditional plans, health care insurance may be within reach.

Here are a few things small-business owners should know about providing health care insurance:

  • Reform is in the offing. Small businesses pay some 18 percent more than their larger counterparts for the same health insurance policy, but the federal government is working to change this. On March 23, 2010, The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, nicknamed Obamacare, was signed into law by the president. Most of its changes are scheduled to take effect by 2014. The upshot: Through incentives, tax credits, and affordable insurance exchanges , the cost of providing health care coverage to workers will become more affordable for small-business owners.
  • Tax credits can offset your costs. One of the most notable changes — and benefits — of health care reform for small businesses is the Small Business Health Care Tax Credit. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, nearly 4 million small businesses can take advantage of this tax credit when providing health insurance benefits to their workers. The first phase of the tax credit entitles businesses with fewer than 25 employees (that meet certain requirements) to a credit of up to 35 percent to offset the cost of providing insurance. In 2014, this tax credit will increase to 50 percent. To determine whether you’re eligible, speak with a tax adviser, refer to the IRS’s coverage, or read this post.
  • Alternatives to traditional coverage exist. Once upon a time, small businesses could only offer health insurance plans to employees through either a preferred provider organization (PPO) or health maintenance organization (HMO). Although these types of insurance plans still exist, today you have other options, too. These include allowing employees to set aside pre-tax dollars to pay for their medical expenses through a health reimbursement arrangement (HRA) or a health savings account (HSA). An HSA is tied to an insurance plan (typically one with a high deductible); an HRA isn’t. Both HSAs and HRAs offer tax advantages to small-business owners and their employees, which can lower the cost of health insurance.
  • Consumer-directed health plans are increasing in popularity. CDHPs were the only type of health insurance plan to experience enrollment growth in 2010, according to a survey conducted by Mercer, a global human resources consultant. These self-funded plans, in which employers and employees pay into an account instead of sending premiums to an insurance company, are based on the premise that not everyone will use all of the traditional health insurance plan dollars that have been allocated. In 2011, 18 percent of small businesses are expected to offer CDHPs. Another benefit of CDHPs: Enrollees are more likely to participate in wellness programs and demonstrate both cost-cutting and health-conscious behaviors when they play a more direct role in budgeting.
no comments >

New Guidance on Group Health Insurance Coverage Informational Reporting

January 4th, 2012 | 1 Comment |
Category: CDHC, COBRA, Cafeteria Plans, Compliance and Regulatory, FSA, Flexible Spending, HRA, HSA, Health Care Reform, Health Reimbursement, Health Savings Account, Health Savings Accounts, IIAS, IRS, PPACA, Section 125 Plans, State Legislation, Taxes

The IRS has issued new guidance to clarify how employers and benefit plan administrators will need to meet Form W2 health benefit cost reporting requirements, including the treatment of FSAs, HRAs, EAPs and wellness programs, and supplemental coverage.

The W2 reporting requirements were created under PPACA and for informational purposes only so that employees are provided with comparable consumer information on the cost of their health care coverage. Notice 2012-9 restates and amends the interim guidance initially provided in Notice 2011-28 and includes the following changes:

  • States that the reporting requirement does not apply to coverage under a health FSA if contributions occur only through employee salary reduction elections (Q&A-19).
  • Clarifies that employers may include the cost of coverage under programs not required to be included under applicable interim relief, such as the cost of coverage under an HRA (Q&A-33).
  • Employers are not required to include the cost of coverage under an employee assistance program, wellness program, or on-site medical clinic in the reportable amount if the employer does not charge a premium with respect to that type of coverage provided under COBRA to a qualifying beneficiary (Q&A-32).
  • Employers do have to include the cost of any supplemental health benefits, such as cancer insurance that they pay for, but they do not have to include the cost of supplemental health benefits that the employees pay for with after-tax dollars (Q&A-38).

The guidance is applicable beginning with 2012 Forms W2 (forms required for the 2012 calendar year that employers are required to give employees by the end of January 2013). In addition, employers may rely on the guidance provided in this notice if they voluntarily choose to report the cost of coverage on 2011 Forms W2, even though this reporting is not required for 2011.

Click here to read Notice 2012-9.

1 comment >

Jobs Bill Would Cap Employer Exclusion and HSA/HRA Deductions

September 21st, 2011 | No Comments |
Category: CDHC, Compliance and Regulatory, HRA, HSA, Health Reimbursement, Health Savings Account, Health Savings Accounts, Section 125 Plans, Uncategorized

The release of President a Obama’s deficit reduction plan comes just a week after the President submitted to Congress the actual text of his proposed jobs legislation.

NAHU’s greatest concern with S. 1549 , which seems quite unlikely to move forward in its current form, is that, as a pay for, the bill would change the tax treatment of employer-sponsored health insurance. Section 401 of the bill limits the value of all itemized deductions for married couples filing jointly with adjusted gross income of at least $250,000 and single taxpayers with adjusted gross income of at least $200,000 to 28 percent. This would include the cost of employer-sponsored health coverage and deductions for health-spending accounts (HSAs and HRAs). The amount that is reported by the employer for the employee is not excludable by the taxpayer. Republicans have expressed openness to some elements of the jobs proposal but have generally opposed the proposed tax changes and other revenue raisers that President Obama outlined. A number of Democrats also have spoken out against elements of the President’s proposal.

no comments >

May owners of an LLC (usually called “LLC members”) participate in the LLC’s medical or cafeteria plan and receive employer HSA contributions?

August 30th, 2011 | 2 Comments |
Category: Cafeteria Plans, Compliance and Regulatory, HSA, Health Reimbursement, Health Savings Account, Health Savings Accounts, IRS, Section 125 Plans, Taxes

 

A limited liability company’s (LLC’s) health plans may create special issues with respect to LLC member participation. This is because LLCs may be treated as either a partnership or a corporation (depending on how the LLC has elected to be treated), and for tax purposes the IRC treats partnerships and corporations differently. No IRS guidance specifically addresses the status of LLC members for purposes of health plan participation, including participation in a medical or cafeteria plan. But the general rules of Section 125 (also known as the cafeteria plan rules) would likely apply as described below.

 LLC Structured as a Partnership

 Pre-tax premium payroll deductions are subject to IRC Section 125. Under Section 125, as a general rule only employees are eligible to participate in the cafeteria plan. Partners in a partnership are considered self-employed individuals, not employees. Thus, for LLCs that are taxed as partnerships, members of the LLC generally cannot participate in a cafeteria plan. This means that the LLC members would not be eligible to benefit from the tax advantages of paying premiums on a pre-tax basis. But those LLC members may still be eligible to participate (on an after-tax basis) in the medical policy/plan as an eligible person, depending on the definition of eligibility under the plan.

 If, however, the plan is offered on a post-tax basis outside of a cafeteria plan, or on a non-contributory basis (where the employer pays all of the premiums), then the owner may participate in the group health plan. In addition, if they are self-employed as LLC members, the members may be able to take a deduction on their federal income tax returns; this would really be a taxation issue best addressed by an accountant or tax counsel.

 LLC Structured as a C Corporation Where LLC Members Are Considered Employees Because They Are Receiving W-2 Reportable Wages

 If the LLC has elected to be taxed as a C Corporation, then the LLC member may be considered an employee eligible to participate in the cafeteria plan. That said, the salary reduction under the cafeteria plan may only be from the individual’s compensation as an employee.

 Employer HSA Contributions

 With respect to an HSA, if the HSA contributions are made through the cafeteria plan, then the same rules as above would apply and the answer would depend on whether the LLC is treated as a partnership or a C Corporation. If the LLC is treated as a partnership, then the employer could not make a pre-tax contribution to the LLC member’s HSA account. However, if the LLC is treated as a corporation, and the LLC member is considered an employee, then the employer could make pre-tax contributions to the LLC member’s HSA accounts (although those members would likely be considered highly compensated, so there may be nondiscrimination issues if non-highly compensated individuals are not also receiving employer HSA contributions).

 If the HSA contributions are made on an after-tax basis, then the employer would not be bound by the Section 125 restrictions with respect to the LLC members. However, the comparability rules would then apply. The comparability requirements basically require employees to make comparable contributions for all comparable participating employees. Comparable participating employees are employees who are in the same group with respect to benefits (i.e., self-coverage, self-plus-one coverage, etc.). Thus, so long as the employer satisfies the comparability rules, the employer could contribute to the LLC members’ HSA accounts.

 Finally, regardless of the LLC structure, the LLC members could always make their own HSA contributions on a post-tax basis and take the contributed amount as a deduction on their own individual federal income tax return. Again, this may necessitate guidance from the member’s own tax professional.

2 comments >

More than 11.4 million Americans now covered by HSA Eligible PLans

June 21st, 2011 | No Comments |
Category: CDHC, COBRA, Compliance and Regulatory, HRA, HSA, Health Care Reform, Health Reimbursement, Health Savings Account, Health Savings Accounts, IRS, PPACA, Taxes, Uncategorized

A release from America’s Health Insurance Plans:

AHIP Urges Policymakers to Prevent Disruption for HSA Policyholders 

Washington, DC – More than 11.4 million Americans are covered by Health Savings Account (HSA)-eligible insurance plans, a more than 14 percent increase since last year, according to a new census released today by America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) finds. 

 

Health Savings Accounts were authorized starting in January 2004.  Since then, AHIP has conducted an annual census of health plans participating in the HSA health plan market. This year’s census shows that enrollment in HSA plans has nearly doubled over the last three years, from 6.1 million enrollees in January 2008 to 11.4 million in January 2011.
 
“HSA plans continue to be a vital source of affordable coverage for millions of families and employers across the country,” said Karen Ignagni, President and CEO of AHIP.
 
Key findings from the census include:

  • As of January 2011, approximately 11.4 million people were covered by HSA plans, an increase of more than 14 percent since last year.
     
  • Between January 2010 and January 2011, the fastest growing market for HSA plans was for large-group coverage, which rose by 26 percent, followed by individual market coverage, which grew by 15 percent.
     
  • In the individual market, 2.4 million covered lives are enrolled in HSA plans, while approximately 2.8 million lives were enrolled in HSA coverage in the small-group market and over 6.3 million lives were covered in the large-group market.
     
  • States with the highest levels of HSA enrollment were California (1,073,319 enrollees), Texas (844,832 enrollees), Ohio (728,868 enrollees), Illinois (690,509 enrollees), Florida (656,243 enrollees) and Minnesota (507,307 enrollees).

 

AHIP is reaching out to policymakers on both sides of the aisle about ways to mitigate the potential unintended consequences of provisions in the new health care reform law that could disrupt or limit the availability of coverage through HSA plans, including: 

  • Restrictions on Over-the-Counter Medications: Starting this year, HSA funds can no longer be used to purchase over-the-counter (OTC) medications without a prescription.  This requirement reduces consumers’ access to common OTC drugs, such as allergy medications, and instead provides an incentive to use higher-cost prescription drug alternatives. 
     
  • Medical Loss Ratio: The medical loss ratio (MLR) regulation is particularly problematic for HSA-eligible plans.  By Congressional design, these plans are intended to provide consumers with a high-deductible, low-premium coverage option along with the ability so save for health care expenses through an HSA.  While these plans typically have lower benefit costs, they are not necessarily less costly to administer on a per-enrollee basis, and, as a result, naturally have lower loss ratios.  Policymakers should recognize the unique nature of HSA plans to preserve consumers’ access to this important coverage option. 
     
  • Minimum Actuarial Value Requirement: Effective in 2014, insurance coverage sold in the individual and small-group markets must meet certain minimum actuarial values for each level of coverage provided: bronze, silver, gold, and platinum.  The lowest level, bronze, must have a minimum 60 percent actuarial value, which is the dollar value of the average expected benefits paid out by the plan.  The ACA directs the HHS Secretary to establish the process for determining actuarial values and states that the Secretary “may” include the amount of the annual employer HSA contributions toward the actuarial value calculation.  Including employer HSA contributions in the actuarial value calculation significantly increases the likelihood that HSA plans will meet the minimum requirement and will help ensure consumers continue to have access to the high-quality, affordable coverage they rely on today. 


For the full report and slides, please visit the links below:
Full Report: http://www.ahipresearch.org/pdfs/HSA2011.pdf
Slides: http://www.ahipresearch.org/pdfs/HSA2011-slides.pdf

no comments >

HSA Contributions and Assets Continue Rapid Growth Curve

June 2nd, 2011 | No Comments |
Category: CDHC, Compliance and Regulatory, FSA, Flexible Spending, HRA, HSA, Health Care Reform, Health Reimbursement, Health Savings Account, Health Savings Accounts, IRS, Taxes, Uncategorized

More Americans are using HSAs to save and pay for medical expenses, according to a new report from the J.P. Morgan Treasury Services. The report shows the average HSA balance is up 7 percent from 2009, at $1,494, and the average account contribution rose slightly in 2010 to $1,884, compared to $1,816 in 2009. The report includes the J.P. Morgan HSA Program Snapshot which details the saving, spending and investing patterns and trends among 700,000 HSA account holders in 2010. The average age of account holders is 43, and 73 percent of account holders contributed more than they spent during each month in 2010 (up from 68 percent in 2009), the report showed.

“As health care costs continue to rise year over year, Americans are increasingly leveraging HSAs as a means for using pre-tax dollars on medical expenses, as well as a way to invest and earn money for future health costs,” says David Josephs, managing director at J.P. Morgan.

no comments >

Proposed Family and Retirement Health Investment Act of 2011 would benefits FSAs and HSAs

May 31st, 2011 | 2 Comments |
Category: CDHC, Compliance and Regulatory, FSA, Flexible Spending, HSA, Health Care Reform, Health Savings Account, Health Savings Accounts, IRS, Uncategorized

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, introduced Thursday a bill that would modify and streamline rules for health savings accounts and flexible spending accounts.

Companion legislation was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by U.S. Rep. Erik Paulsen (R-Minn.).

Known as The Family and Retirement Health Investment Act of 2011, Hatch’s bill would:

  • Allow a husband and wife to make catch-up contributions to the same HSA
  • Remove the onerous new restrictions on the use of HSA and FSA dollars for the purchase of over-the-counter drugs
  • Allow individuals to roll-over up to $500 from their FSA accounts
  • Clarify the use of prescription drugs as preventive care that will not be subject to an HSA-eligible plan deductible
  • Reauthorize the use of Medicaid health opportunity accounts
  • Promote wellness by expanding the definition of qualified medical expenses to encourage more exercise and better diet
  • Allow seniors enrolled in Medicare Part A to continue contributing to their HSAs
  • Allow for the purchase of low-premium health insurance and long-term care insurance with HSA dollars.
  • Repeals the recently enacted deductible limits of $2,000 for single coverage and $4,000 for family coverage for plans sold to small employers.
  • Allows purchase of COBRA coverage, long-term care insurance, and HSA-qualified policies from an HSA.

“This legislation will provide American workers and retirees with a common-sense way of improving access to quality, affordable health care,” said Hatch, a ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee. “These health plans empower Americans to take control of their health and well-being. Health Savings Accounts and Flexible Spending Accounts allow consumers to make informed decisions about their health care and will help restrain costs by putting people in charge of their health choices. ”

Just three months ago, Republican lawmakers introduced legislation that would abolish a provision in health reform law, which prohibits Americans to use their FSA and HSA funds to purchase over-the-counter medications without a prescription. [See FSA changes go into effect]

Rep. Erik Paulsen, R-Minn., and Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, introduced the bill, known as The Patients’ Freedom to Choose Act of 2011.

Groups such as the Consumer Healthcare Products Association, the Health Choices Coaltion, and the National Association of Chain Drug Stores have pushed for the repeal of the OTC provision, saying it undermines tax-advantaged health plans and increases costs for patients.

“Instead of saving consumers money and encouraging them to proactively address their health needs when they can and should, this provision will increase costs to the health care system and place a new burden on already over-burdened physician offices,” Shawn Martin, director of government relations for the American Osteopathic Association recently said in a statement.

The American Osteopathic Association is part of the Health Choices Coalition, which sent a letter to Congress earlier this month.

The House of Representatives also passed a measure earlier this month that prohibits workers from receiving tax-free reimbursement from their HSA or FSA for out-of-pocket expenses relating to most abortions. The law does not apply to abortions performed in the cases of pregnancy resulting from rape or incest.

2 comments >
< previous page


© 2011 American Benefits Group. All Rights Reserved. | Entries (RSS) | Website by Stevens 470