Receive updates through RSS feed or email:
myBenefitsBlog.comJoin RSS Feed | Learn more about RSS

News and Views for the Employee Benefits Community

myBenefitsBlog.com

American Benefits Group Network:

American Benefits Group
myFlexResource myCommuterConnect myCOBRAResource myHSAver


  • Categories

    • Cafeteria Plans (4)
    • CDHC (23)
    • COBRA (16)
    • Compliance and Regulatory (59)
    • DOL (1)
    • Flexible Spending (18)
    • FSA (9)
    • Health Care Reform (51)
    • Health Reimbursement (17)
    • Health Savings Account (14)
    • Health Savings Accounts (16)
    • HRA (12)
    • HSA (16)
    • IIAS (4)
    • IRS (25)
    • PPACA (15)
    • Section 125 Plans (4)
    • State Legislation (8)
    • Taxes (25)
    • Transit and Parking Section 132 (1)
    • Uncategorized (44)
  • Archives

    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • November 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • December 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Recent Articles

    • EBRI Study – HSA and HRA Accounts Continue Growth Trend
    • New FAQ’s from DOL for You
    • Summary of Benefit Coverage Final Rule Released
    • Health savings accounts surpass $12.4 billion
    • Access to Independent Health Insurance Advisors Act of 2012 is Introduced

IRS Issues 2011 Version of Publication 969 on HSAs, HRAs, Health FSAs and MSAs

January 31st, 2012 | No Comments |
Category: CDHC, Cafeteria Plans, Compliance and Regulatory, FSA, Flexible Spending, HRA, HSA, Health Care Reform, Health Reimbursement, Health Savings Account, Health Savings Accounts, IIAS, IRS, Section 125 Plans, Taxes, Uncategorized

Publication 969 has been updated for use in preparing 2011 tax returns. This publication provides basic information about HSAs, HRAs, health FSAs, Archer MSAs and Medicare Advantage MSAs, including brief descriptions of benefits, eligibility requirements, contribution limits and distribution issues. There are very few changes to the 2011 version. The publication has been updated to reflect two changes that apply beginning in 2011: the prescription requirement for OTC drugs (other than insulin) purchased after 2010, and the increase (to 20 percent) in the additional tax on HSA and MSA distributions not used for qualified medical expenses.

Click here to view IRS Publication 969.

no comments >

New Guidance on Group Health Insurance Coverage Informational Reporting

January 4th, 2012 | 1 Comment |
Category: CDHC, COBRA, Cafeteria Plans, Compliance and Regulatory, FSA, Flexible Spending, HRA, HSA, Health Care Reform, Health Reimbursement, Health Savings Account, Health Savings Accounts, IIAS, IRS, PPACA, Section 125 Plans, State Legislation, Taxes

The IRS has issued new guidance to clarify how employers and benefit plan administrators will need to meet Form W2 health benefit cost reporting requirements, including the treatment of FSAs, HRAs, EAPs and wellness programs, and supplemental coverage.

The W2 reporting requirements were created under PPACA and for informational purposes only so that employees are provided with comparable consumer information on the cost of their health care coverage. Notice 2012-9 restates and amends the interim guidance initially provided in Notice 2011-28 and includes the following changes:

  • States that the reporting requirement does not apply to coverage under a health FSA if contributions occur only through employee salary reduction elections (Q&A-19).
  • Clarifies that employers may include the cost of coverage under programs not required to be included under applicable interim relief, such as the cost of coverage under an HRA (Q&A-33).
  • Employers are not required to include the cost of coverage under an employee assistance program, wellness program, or on-site medical clinic in the reportable amount if the employer does not charge a premium with respect to that type of coverage provided under COBRA to a qualifying beneficiary (Q&A-32).
  • Employers do have to include the cost of any supplemental health benefits, such as cancer insurance that they pay for, but they do not have to include the cost of supplemental health benefits that the employees pay for with after-tax dollars (Q&A-38).

The guidance is applicable beginning with 2012 Forms W2 (forms required for the 2012 calendar year that employers are required to give employees by the end of January 2013). In addition, employers may rely on the guidance provided in this notice if they voluntarily choose to report the cost of coverage on 2011 Forms W2, even though this reporting is not required for 2011.

Click here to read Notice 2012-9.

1 comment >

Jobs Bill Would Cap Employer Exclusion and HSA/HRA Deductions

September 21st, 2011 | No Comments |
Category: CDHC, Compliance and Regulatory, HRA, HSA, Health Reimbursement, Health Savings Account, Health Savings Accounts, Section 125 Plans, Uncategorized

The release of President a Obama’s deficit reduction plan comes just a week after the President submitted to Congress the actual text of his proposed jobs legislation.

NAHU’s greatest concern with S. 1549 , which seems quite unlikely to move forward in its current form, is that, as a pay for, the bill would change the tax treatment of employer-sponsored health insurance. Section 401 of the bill limits the value of all itemized deductions for married couples filing jointly with adjusted gross income of at least $250,000 and single taxpayers with adjusted gross income of at least $200,000 to 28 percent. This would include the cost of employer-sponsored health coverage and deductions for health-spending accounts (HSAs and HRAs). The amount that is reported by the employer for the employee is not excludable by the taxpayer. Republicans have expressed openness to some elements of the jobs proposal but have generally opposed the proposed tax changes and other revenue raisers that President Obama outlined. A number of Democrats also have spoken out against elements of the President’s proposal.

no comments >

May owners of an LLC (usually called “LLC members”) participate in the LLC’s medical or cafeteria plan and receive employer HSA contributions?

August 30th, 2011 | 1 Comment |
Category: Cafeteria Plans, Compliance and Regulatory, HSA, Health Reimbursement, Health Savings Account, Health Savings Accounts, IRS, Section 125 Plans, Taxes

 

A limited liability company’s (LLC’s) health plans may create special issues with respect to LLC member participation. This is because LLCs may be treated as either a partnership or a corporation (depending on how the LLC has elected to be treated), and for tax purposes the IRC treats partnerships and corporations differently. No IRS guidance specifically addresses the status of LLC members for purposes of health plan participation, including participation in a medical or cafeteria plan. But the general rules of Section 125 (also known as the cafeteria plan rules) would likely apply as described below.

 LLC Structured as a Partnership

 Pre-tax premium payroll deductions are subject to IRC Section 125. Under Section 125, as a general rule only employees are eligible to participate in the cafeteria plan. Partners in a partnership are considered self-employed individuals, not employees. Thus, for LLCs that are taxed as partnerships, members of the LLC generally cannot participate in a cafeteria plan. This means that the LLC members would not be eligible to benefit from the tax advantages of paying premiums on a pre-tax basis. But those LLC members may still be eligible to participate (on an after-tax basis) in the medical policy/plan as an eligible person, depending on the definition of eligibility under the plan.

 If, however, the plan is offered on a post-tax basis outside of a cafeteria plan, or on a non-contributory basis (where the employer pays all of the premiums), then the owner may participate in the group health plan. In addition, if they are self-employed as LLC members, the members may be able to take a deduction on their federal income tax returns; this would really be a taxation issue best addressed by an accountant or tax counsel.

 LLC Structured as a C Corporation Where LLC Members Are Considered Employees Because They Are Receiving W-2 Reportable Wages

 If the LLC has elected to be taxed as a C Corporation, then the LLC member may be considered an employee eligible to participate in the cafeteria plan. That said, the salary reduction under the cafeteria plan may only be from the individual’s compensation as an employee.

 Employer HSA Contributions

 With respect to an HSA, if the HSA contributions are made through the cafeteria plan, then the same rules as above would apply and the answer would depend on whether the LLC is treated as a partnership or a C Corporation. If the LLC is treated as a partnership, then the employer could not make a pre-tax contribution to the LLC member’s HSA account. However, if the LLC is treated as a corporation, and the LLC member is considered an employee, then the employer could make pre-tax contributions to the LLC member’s HSA accounts (although those members would likely be considered highly compensated, so there may be nondiscrimination issues if non-highly compensated individuals are not also receiving employer HSA contributions).

 If the HSA contributions are made on an after-tax basis, then the employer would not be bound by the Section 125 restrictions with respect to the LLC members. However, the comparability rules would then apply. The comparability requirements basically require employees to make comparable contributions for all comparable participating employees. Comparable participating employees are employees who are in the same group with respect to benefits (i.e., self-coverage, self-plus-one coverage, etc.). Thus, so long as the employer satisfies the comparability rules, the employer could contribute to the LLC members’ HSA accounts.

 Finally, regardless of the LLC structure, the LLC members could always make their own HSA contributions on a post-tax basis and take the contributed amount as a deduction on their own individual federal income tax return. Again, this may necessitate guidance from the member’s own tax professional.

1 comment >


© 2011 American Benefits Group. All Rights Reserved. | Entries (RSS) | Website by Stevens 470